Gun Rights Blog Sued for Infringement

Filed under:Bill of Rights — posted by 3wire on 7/27/2010 @ 10:02 pm

From: WorldNetDaily

A popular blog that has kept citizens abreast of how Americans successfully defend themselves from crime by being armed has been suspended while its organizers deal with a copyright infringement claim from a newspaper, the blog itself has announced.

David Burnett said in a statement his Armed Citizen site is closed for now, and its future will depend on what happens in the case.

The site was targeted in a federal court lawsuit filed by Righthaven LLC, which apparently is working on behalf of the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

The lawsuit is one of dozens the plaintiffs have brought to court.

At issue for the Armed Citizen are six stories originating from the Las Vegas Review-Journal that had been cited on the website over the years.

“The Armed Citizen has been excerpting articles from newspaper, TV station, and radio station websites for a number of years without a single complaint or infringement notice,” Burnett wrote in a website statement. “If any copyright holders decided that The Armed Citizen had exceeded fair use, they only needed to send us an e-mail.

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=184201

More Reach from E3

Filed under:Gaming — posted by 3wire on 6/15/2010 @ 3:51 pm

I can’t wait.

Halo Reach Video

Halo Reach Video

Bungie at E3

Filed under:Gaming — posted by 3wire on 6/14/2010 @ 6:29 pm

Bungie Dudes at E3.  I think those Reach figures might be bigger than the ones that come with the game.

Starbucks – Free WiFi at All Locations

Filed under:Technology — posted by 3wire on @ 5:13 pm

Finally.

From: Crunch Gear

Starbucks just tweeted that, starting July 1, there will be free, one-click WiFi at all Starbucks locations.

We’re very excited to announce that coming July 1st: Free. 1 click. No registration WIFI at all US locations! 🙂

This came from the official @starbucks Twitter account so either someone hacked them or this is the dog’s honest truth.

Portal 2 release date delayed due to ‘public safety concerns’

Filed under:Gaming — posted by 3wire on 6/9/2010 @ 5:10 pm

From: Chris Gaylord

Portal 2” has been delayed. Why? “Making games is hard.”That’s the tongue-in-cheek announcement from Valve Software, the video game’s developer. The company reports Wednesday that Portal 2 will not be done in time to make its scheduled “holiday season 2010” release date. Expect the hotly anticipated sequel to arrive in 2011.

Valve’s press release – a joint statement with Aperture Science, the fictional company from “Portal” – explains that “public safety concerns factored into the decision” to postpone the game.

“Even though Portal 2 will arrive slightly later than planned, all life on earth won’t instantaneously stop as every molecule in your body explodes at the speed of light, which is what would happen should a rip ever appear in the fabric of Valve Time,” says the statement.

Why Carrying a Gun is a Civilized Act.

Filed under:Bill of Rights,Culture War — posted by 3wire on 5/27/2010 @ 2:44 pm

From: Warrior Times

I have seen this circulate many times and have tried to find the original post. All I can determine is that is appeared around 2007, is attributed to Maj. L. Caudill USMC (Ret) and a lot of bloggers didn’t attribute it to anyone. It is such a sweet and cogent piece that it must be brought out and revisited periodically. Thank you Major Caudill, where ever you are.

When I carry a gun, I don’t do so because I am looking for a fight, but because I’m looking to be left alone. The gun at my side means that I cannot be forced, only persuaded. I don’t carry it because I’m afraid, but because it enables me to be unafraid. It doesn’t limit the actions of those who would interact with me through reason, only the actions of those who would do so by force.

It removes force from the equation…and that’s why carrying a gun is a civilized act.

Read the whole thing.

Facebook Responds to Privacy Criticism

Filed under:Technology — posted by 3wire on 5/26/2010 @ 5:34 pm

WSJ

After fierce criticism, Facebook is announcing changes to the site’s privacy controls. Liveblog: http://on.wsj.com/aKtEdA

Militirization of Police

Filed under:Bill of Rights,Culture War — posted by Maverick on 5/18/2010 @ 7:23 pm

More than a  year ago, then Senator Barack Obama called for a “civilian security force” that is just as powerful and well-funded as the military.

Video (the comment is made at approximately the 16-minute mark.)

The war on drugs, however, has already created a military police force that, in many cases, has well overstepped its boundaries. The recent video out of Columbia, MO isn’t a lone incident, it has been the norm in many cities for decades.

I bring these two points together to say that if we continue on our current path, it would not take much time to redirect many police forces, which have already become militarized, from the war on drugs to a war on those inciting sedition (read: Tea Partiers).

I don’t exactly have a solution or comment to make other than to say that when the change comes, there will be little time to react before all those not willing to go along lock-step are silenced.

Browsers May Reveal Online Activities

Filed under:Bill of Rights,Technology — posted by 3wire on 5/17/2010 @ 5:38 pm

From: EFF

EFF UNVEILED RESULTS FROM THE “PANOPTICLICK” BROWSER PRIVACY PROJECT, which demonstrated that more than 8 in 10 people use browsers with unique, trackable signatures. Having a distinct browser signature means your individual movements on the web may be easier to track, and several companies are already selling products that claim to use browser fingerprinting to help websites identify users and their online activities.

For the full white paper “How Unique Is Your Web Browser?”:

https://panopticlick.eff.org/browser-uniqueness.pdf

For more about Panopticlick:

http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2010/05/13

Citizenship

Filed under:Culture War,Our Money,War on Terror — posted by Q Ball on 5/11/2010 @ 3:27 pm

Gabrielle Anwar is a British actress who failed to tell the truth in order to become an American citizen for the sole purpose of voting for Barack Obama. I discoved this when she was a guest on the “Late Late Show” hosted by Craig Ferguson. She stated very plainly that she became an American because she had “hope” which she emphasizes during the interview. Her interview is incredibly telling once the subject of being an American is reached. Craig Ferguson, who is a naturalized American citizen, begins discussing his experience and she tells him that she thought the experience was odd. One particular objection she had was a question on the application that asked if the United States went to war with England would she support the U.S.. She all but said she would not and used the excuse of “I have family in Engalnd”. This woman’s only reason for becoming an Amercian citizen I believe, was that she could vote for the president. Grabreille Anwar has abused our laws and our system of governmet. She doesn’t want to be a citizen of the United States anymore than I want to be a citizen of England, which is nil. I hereby call on any senators or congressmen to start an investigation to determine whether she lied on her application and to revoke her citizenship.
This interview happend months ago, but I decided to write about it now in light of the attempted bombing in New York City. The terrorist who tried to set off a bomb in Times Square was a natualized citizen from Pakistan. This country needs a serious overhall of the guidelines that allow these people to become citizens while people who truly love this country and have businesses here wait for years, to no avail. I personally know a British ex-pat who falls in to this category. He has been here for over 10 years and has done everything required of him yet he is not a citizen. I already consider him a citizen for all that he has contributed to the local community and the country at large. What has Gabreille Anwar done? She cheated to get into this country so she could affect the outcome of our election. I find what she did deplorable.

If you want to see the interview for yourself, here is a video from YouTube

Liberty

Filed under:Bill of Rights — posted by Q Ball on @ 3:12 pm

“We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion:
the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases,
while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage
of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force.”
Ayn Rand

The Worst Tyranny

Filed under:Bill of Rights,Culture War,Our Money — posted by 3wire on 5/6/2010 @ 8:56 am

The Moon is a Harsh Mistress“There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not want merely because you think it would be good for him.”

– Robert Heinlein “The Moon is a Harsh Mistress

The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress

Army Exercise Targets Tea Party as Terrorists

Filed under:Bill of Rights — posted by 3wire on 4/29/2010 @ 2:28 pm

Re-post from Warrior Times

Tea Party Terrorist?

Tea Party Terrorist?

It seems the Army is running some scary scenarios with Heath care and Tax protesters as the ‘bad guys”.

New info as of 16:00 CDT

Update from Mark Alexander – April 29, 2010

PUBLISHER’S NOTE: Regarding my essay, Army Preps for Tea Party ‘Terrorists’, I was contacted by senior command staff at Ft. Knox this afternoon. There was a security exercise at Ft. Knox this week, but an officer in the security loop altered the scenario “in order to make it more realistic.” Those alterations were described in my essay, exactly as they appeared. The command staff informed me that the alterations were not approved at the command level and that the individual who circulated the scenario through official channels will “receive appropriate counsel.” I was assured that the Command staff would not have authorized such a scenario.

Social Justice

Filed under:Bill of Rights,Culture War,Our Money — posted by 3wire on 4/13/2010 @ 2:34 pm

From: The Tenth Amendment Center

It appears that there are two popular definitions of “social justice”. One involves an individual who chooses to give freely to people in need; this one is historically referred to as charity. The other requires the use of government force under the guise of good will to seize production from one and give to another. This one is nothing but theft and historically results in little less than slavery. Unfortunately, this is what most people mean when they speak of social justice.

Definition of Justice:

“The administering of deserved punishment or reward”

Is it possible that adding the word “social” before “justice” can result in a definition that makes it “just” to steal from someone because it is socially acceptable to do so? Promoters of social justice should spend a moment and reflect on which definition they support, why they embrace it and whether their concept of “justice” infringes on another person’s rights or freedom, and whether this other person guilty of a crime and thus punishment.

more

Apple Lobbys for Cap-and-Trade, Avoids Same

Filed under:Bill of Rights,Culture War,Our Money — posted by 3wire on 4/7/2010 @ 2:34 pm

From: Washington Examiner

So if Apple’s lobbying effort is successful, American companies will pay for their carbon emissions, but no such carbon costs will fall on Hon Hai Precision Industry Company, which made your iPad.

Under cap-and-trade, Apple company would pay for the 400,000 tons of carbon dioxide emitted annually by its U.S. buildings and domestic operations, and also for the 500,000 tons of carbon dioxide emitted by shipping its products. But the 3.8 million tons of CO2 emitted by its manufacturing — 81 percent of the company’s total — would be exempt from a carbon tax because the emissions would be in China.

Disarming America

Filed under:Bill of Rights,Culture War,Shooting Sports — posted by 3wire on 4/5/2010 @ 2:56 pm

From: Warrior Times

This from the Pittsburgh Post Gazette is an oldie but goody. I like to trot this one out from time to time when people ask me “why so much politics”,  “Why do you feel the need to post and re-post every little political blurb about guns and the Constitution“? There is even a pretty good gun website where right on the home page banner it says ” No Politics, Just Guns”. Wouldn’t it be great if we didn’t have to worry about our freedoms? But if that was the case we wouldn’t need Sheepdogs or Warriors.  I could spend a lot more time drinking Scotch and smoking cigars and less time scouring the Internet and Old Media looking for the next threat vector. Until that day, we remain as always.  Now here from 2007:

more

AIX Battlefield 2 Mod

Filed under:Gaming — posted by 3wire on 3/25/2010 @ 5:53 pm

http://www.aixtended.com/

There Aint No Rules Here

Filed under:Bill of Rights,Culture War,Our Money — posted by 3wire on 3/24/2010 @ 10:55 am

From: Newt Gingrich

Democratic Congressman Alcee Hastings (who, while serving as a federal judge, was impeached and removed from the bench before being elected to the House) articulated the principles of this machine mentality on Sunday when he said, “There ain’t no rules here, we’re trying to accomplish something. . . .All this talk about rules. . . .When the deal goes down . . . we make ’em up as we go along.”

It is hard for the American people to believe their leaders on the Left are this bad.

They are.

Civil War

Filed under:Bill of Rights,Culture War,Our Money — posted by 3wire on 3/23/2010 @ 3:04 pm

From: Dennis Prager

Thank God this civil war is non-violent. But the fact is that the left and the rest of the country share almost no values. The American value system and the leftist value system are irreconcilable. If the left wins, America’s values lose. If American values prevail, the left loses.

After Sunday’s vote, for the first time in American history, one could no longer confidently believe that the American system will prevail. And if we don’t fight for it, we don’t deserve it.

“Smart Meters” May Invade Privacy – EFF

Filed under:Bill of Rights,Culture War,Science,Technology — posted by 3wire on 3/22/2010 @ 6:17 pm

From:  Electronic Frontier Foundation

EFF IS DEMANDING BETTER PRIVACY PROTECTIONS FOR ENERGY CUSTOMERS RECEIVING “SMART METERS,” new devices that measure your home’s energy use in unprecedented detail. Energy usage data, measured moment by moment, allows the reconstruction of a household’s activities:

when people wake up, when they come home, when they go on vacation, and maybe even when they take a hot bath. Without strong protections, this information can and will be secured by civil litigants (like divorce lawyers or insurance companies), criminals, law enforcement, and more. The states and the federal government should ensure that energy customers get the protection they deserve at their homes — where privacy rights should be strongest.

more


previous page · next page